<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Blackgeekdom - Latest Comments in Quick Review:  Indiana Jones&amp;#8230;Kingdom&amp;#8230;Crystal Skull</title><link>http://blackgeekdom.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:02:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Quick Review:  Indiana Jones&amp;#8230;Kingdom&amp;#8230;Crystal Skull</title><link>http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2008/05/24/quick-review-indiana-joneskingdomcrystal-skull/#comment-1724533</link><description>The problem with the film is that the storyline is not challenging to comtemporary audiences.  How maany times has the whole " Area 51, frozen alien in the desert," cliche been exhaustively played out in the movies and on television.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How many different ways can "Thevin' Stealberg," portray an alien with an oblong head...Close Encounters,  E.T.   Why borrow from a genre he benchmarked many years ago?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beezy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:02:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Review:  Indiana Jones&amp;#8230;Kingdom&amp;#8230;Crystal Skull</title><link>http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2008/05/24/quick-review-indiana-joneskingdomcrystal-skull/#comment-1724532</link><description>I think they suffered from the same problem Phantom Menance had,  impossible for it to live up to the hype.    People wanted to be transported back to the "good old days" of the first three films.   The  problem is that the good old day where never as good as we  remember them.   If raiders where to come out now it would be a marginal hit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Obsidian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:31:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>